View Full Version : What's worse?
derekisdman
01-25-2005, 01:06 AM
After reading many of the hate threads about ashley simpson, lohan, duff and stuff, I came up with the idea:
What's worse: Actors trying to become singers or Singers trying to become actors?
derekisdman
01-25-2005, 01:23 AM
I say actors trying to be singers. Though they are probably equally bad at their attempts, the results are usually more pitiful in the singing department because people actually buy it. Even if the album is awfully horrid, it can still go platinum somehow.
When singers try to act, they usually only have little cameos. There are the worst cases when the rappers try to do ghetto action flicks and stuff, but those usually don't even do well at the box office.
Keith Brown
01-25-2005, 09:03 AM
All I have to say about this is:
Eddie Murphy's "Party all the time" song is one of the greatest songs of all time.
true story.
Magita
01-25-2005, 09:36 AM
Actors to singers.
NatrlBornThrllr
01-25-2005, 11:13 AM
Equally awful, with a few exceptions.
-JP
nickbahh
01-25-2005, 03:17 PM
my girl wants to party all the time party all the time party all the tiiiiiimmeeee
Keith Brown
01-25-2005, 03:31 PM
Originally posted by nickbah04
my girl wants to party all the time party all the time party all the tiiiiiimmeeee
You, my friend.....are quite the conissuer(shitcock..sp?) of tha' fine music.
hondata
01-26-2005, 12:13 AM
Originally posted by Keith Brown
You, my friend.....are quite the conissuer(shitcock..sp?) of tha' fine music.
yers
edd
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3 Beta 1 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.